`Antigravity 2.0` macOS workaround restores extensions and settings

// related

• #0001

  #0001Agents & toolsGoogle AI Forum1 hour ago

  `Antigravity 2.0` quota complaints: `Flash` loses its lightweight edge

  40radar

  AntigravityAI coding agent — Google-model-based dev workflow

  A tiny one-change request reportedly burned about 50 credits, making 1,000 monthly credits thin for daily work. Quota design now matters as much as model quality.

  • —Flash and Pro now effectively draw from the same quota pool, removing the cheaper lane for iterative edits.
  • —Partial refresh moved from roughly 5 hours into a 7-day wait pattern after recovery, weakening reliability for long coding sessions.
  • —At ~50 credits for a small change, the monthly allocation supports only limited agent work before tool switching becomes rational.

  Source: discuss.ai.google.dev/t/ai-model-quota-limits-have-no-usRead original →
• #0002

  #0002Agents & toolsGoogle AI Forum3 hours ago

  `Antigravity` `v2.0.0` Breakage: Staging Endpoint Misconfigured

  50radar

  AntigravityAI coding IDE — agent-based development workflows

  Chat, completions, and agents can fail because the release points at a staging Cloud Code endpoint. Manual v2.0.1 reinstall is the practical fix when auto-update stalls.

  • —language_server.exe launches with --cloud_code_endpoint https://daily-cloudcode-pa.googleapis.com; production OAuth tokens get rejected there.
  • —Failures repeat every 25-30 seconds, breaking loadCodeAssist, fetchUserInfo, and fetchAvailableModels downstream.
  • —v2.0.1 reportedly clears the daily- endpoint, but some auto-updaters download to %LOCALAPPDATA%\antigravity-updater\pending\ without applying.
  • —Windows users stuck on v2.0.0 should skip debugging prompts and reinstall manually; this is a release config bug, not a project setup issue.

  Source: discuss.ai.google.dev/t/fix-for-antigravity-v2-0-0-issueRead original →
• #0003

  #0003Agents & toolsGoogle AI Forum3 hours ago

  `Antigravity` users push back on hidden compute quotas

  60radar

  AntigravityAI coding IDE — agent workflow powered by Google models

  Paid usage turned unpredictable after quota accounting moved from requests to hidden compute. A cheaper plan can now fail mid-workflow; budget risk matters more than model choice.

  • —A $20 Pro user reports 2-3 weeks of HTTP 429 lockouts despite visible quota remaining; reliability became the real blocker.
  • —The May 19 change replaced request limits with hidden compute-used accounting, making agent background scans and micro-queries harder to budget.
  • —Gemini 3.5 Flash is described as more verbose and weaker at coding, burning quota through long explanations instead of useful edits.
  • —Upgrade pressure jumps to $100-$200 Ultra or a reported 5-day ban after quota exhaustion; keep fallback IDE and agent paths ready.

  Source: discuss.ai.google.dev/t/how-antigravity-became-cursor-2-Read original →